Mgr. Dagmar Snopeková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Topoľčany, we register 2,949 hearings and 3,315 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1539 days in the period and was assigned on average 26 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 369 – 388. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 413
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 308

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 14.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 285.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 104 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 57 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 54.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 103.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1105 days in the period and was assigned on average 25 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 20 from 40 possible points and ranked on 444 – 466. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 67.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 301
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 204

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 206 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 336 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 184 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 54.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 91% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 676 days and on average was assigned 209 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 58,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 156
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 91

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 12,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 364 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 427 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 159 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 37,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 83,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 15,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 621 – 630. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 4,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 10,5 z 25.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba na vydanie platobného… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o neplatnosť okamžitého… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 3.420,- Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 2.773,67 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba o zrušenie a… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie výživného na manželku Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1.950,055 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o neplatnosť skončenia… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie rozsahu dedičstva Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného na dospelé… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie mzdy Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba na vydanie platobného… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1250 Eur Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR o zaplatenie 818,80 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1.508,09 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR o zaplatenie 648,37 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.