JUDr. Eva Tóthová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Trenčín, we register 1,300 hearings and 1,641 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1489 days in the period and was assigned on average 129 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 27 from 40 possible points and ranked on 81 – 98. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 78% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 268
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 209

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 94.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 101 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 23 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 22.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 104.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1074 days in the period and was assigned on average 93 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 31.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 31 – 40. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 79.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 178
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 141

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 64 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 77 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 31 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 40.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 108.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 646 days and on average was assigned 90 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 68,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 64
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 44

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,8%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 90 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 59 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 37 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 40,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 129,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 29,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 36 – 38. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 18,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 14.–15.03.2013 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 03.–04.10.2013 Celokrajské školenie sudcov KS v Trenčíne
  • 2012 – 23.04.2012 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 08.–09.10.2012 Rozšírené zasadnute trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne
  • 2011 – 28.–29. marca 2011 – zasadnutie rozšíreného trestného kolégia; 2012 – 23.04.2012 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 08.–09.10.2012 Rozšírené zasadnute trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne; 2013 – 14.–15.03.2013 Rozšírené zasadnutie trestného kolégia KS v Trenčíne, 03.–04.10.2013 Celokrajské školenie sudcov KS v Trenčíne
  • 2011 – 28.–29. marca 2011 – zasadnutie rozšíreného trestného kolégia

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin týrania blízkej… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["T", "H"]
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, pokračovací trestný čin… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["A", "C"]
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, obzvlášť závažný zločin… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["G", "S"]
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin nedovoleného… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["Y", "A"]
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin týrania blízkej… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["P", "F"]
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin ublíženie na… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["O", "H"]
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin výtržníctva Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["A", "B"]
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin zanedbania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – I. S.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin zanedbania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["X", "J"]
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin vydierania a iné Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["M", "S"]
  6. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin zanedbania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["P", "F"]
  7. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin podvodu Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["K", "C"]
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin marenia výkonu… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["Z", "H"]
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin krádeže Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["T", "M"]
  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin krádeže Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Trenčín
    Judge – JUDr. Eva Tóthová
    Defendant – ["V", "H"]
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.