JUDr. Iveta Wildeová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Prešov, we register 2,622 hearings and 2,335 judgements.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1549 days in the period and was assigned on average 16 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 201 – 223. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 9 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 90.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 267
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 242

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 452.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 93 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 58 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 62.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 123% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1113 days in the period and was assigned on average 19 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 30.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 48 – 53. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 92% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 199
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 183

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 250 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 392 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 109 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 27.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 98.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 656 days and on average was assigned 166 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 87,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 71
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 62

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 6,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 0,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 249 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 215 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 72 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 29,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 92,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 28,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 54 – 64. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 13,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 14,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 0
  • 2011 – 0; 2012 – 0
  • 2011 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Spätvzatie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie rozhodcovského… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 2333,79 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 790,48 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o nahradenie prejavu vôle Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zastavenie exekúcie, o… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o neplatnosť dohody o… Hearing will be held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o vydanie platobného rozkazu Hearing will be held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 424,63 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 5.830,05 € s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu škody vo výške… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 2.269,23 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 513.31 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 48 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 3.000 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 586,32 € s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 2185.29 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 381,06 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 186,89 € s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.