JUDr. Janka Butašová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Skalica, we register 3,542 hearings and 4,073 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 21 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 3

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1382 days in the period and was assigned on average 33 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 369 – 388. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 67.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 297
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 200

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 446.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 543 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 491 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 90.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 704.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 3
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1008 days in the period and was assigned on average 31 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 13 from 40 possible points and ranked on 668 – 676. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 5.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 212
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 136

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 1090 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 1012 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 706 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 69.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 96.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 2 and delays prior to case assignment 2.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 608 days and on average was assigned 221 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 69,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 98
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 68

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 10,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 691 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 663 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 330 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 44,8% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 69,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 11,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 690 – 693. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 3,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Školenie sudcov organizované KS Trnava – Omšenie (3 dni)
  • 2011 – Školenie sudcov organizované KS v Trnave – Omšenie (25.–27.5.); 2013 – Školenie sudcov organizované KS Trnava – Omšenie (3 dni)
  • 2011 – Školenie sudcov organizované KS v Trnave – Omšenie (25.–27.5.)

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie otcovstva Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 7.429,37 € s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 2.915,43 € s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 632,62 € s prísl. -… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 2.755,19 € s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 195,14 € s prísl. -… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 280,76 € s prísl. -… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 2.769,78 € s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie vlast. práva, predbežné… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 5.000,00 € s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, Zaplatenie 14.855,76 € s prísl. - PR Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie neprijateľnej zmluvnej… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 195,14 € s prísl. -… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 260,02 € s prísl. -… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 280,76 € s prísl. -… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 2.769,78 € s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie vlast. práva, predbežné… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 2.755,19 € s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 126,43 € s prísl. -… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zaplatenie 7.429,37 € s prísl.… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.