JUDr. Jana Smereková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Michalovce, we register 1,108 hearings and 2,300 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 4 years.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 220 days in the period and was assigned on average 40 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 16 from 40 possible points and ranked on 591 – 600. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 50% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 22
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 11

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 294 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 218 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 84 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 90.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozhodnutie – Osvojenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozhodnutie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozhodnutie – Schválenie právneho úkonu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, osvojenie dieťaťa Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zníženie výživného Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.