JUDr. Roman Fitt

  1. Active chairman at the court Okresný súd Bratislava III, we register 1,927 hearings and 1,454 judgements.
    Note: .
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 22 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1610 days in the period and was assigned on average 93 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 16.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 539 – 548. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 56.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 149
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 84

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 202.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 198 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 118 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 59.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 107.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1170 days in the period and was assigned on average 61 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 492 – 506. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 56.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 118
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 67

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 204 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 195 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 111 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 56.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 101.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 698 days and on average was assigned 45 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 39,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 48
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 19

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 7,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 150 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 76 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 52 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 62,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 114,2% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 20 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 431 – 437. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 3,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 16,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Znížený nápad – §50 ods.3 Zák. 757/2004 Z.z.
  • 2012 – znížený nápad – §50 ods. 3 Zák. 757/2004 Z.z.
  • 2011 – znížený nápad – §50 ods. 3 Zák. 757/2004 Z.z.; 2012 – znížený nápad – §50 ods. 3 Zák. 757/2004 Z.z.; 2013 – Znížený nápad – §50 ods.3 Zák. 757/2004 Z.z.
  • 2011 – znížený nápad – §50 ods. 3 Zák. 757/2004 Z.z.

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – A. O.
  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – H. S.
  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 199 Tr. poriadku Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – B. S.
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zmenu spôsobu výkonu… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – Y. D.
  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – Z. A.
  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zmena primeraných obmedzení Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – A. M.
  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 245 Tr. zákona Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – S. R.
  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – H. K.
  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – L. Z.
  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 294 tr. zák. Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – K. E.
  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, prepustenie z väzby Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – A. M.
  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 157 tr. zák. Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – R. B.
  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 221 Tr. zákona Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bratislava III
    Judge – JUDr. Roman Fitt
    Defendant – G. S.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.