JUDr. Jana Grendárová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava IV, we register 2,777 hearings and 1,046 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

  • , .

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

  • , .

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1467 days in the period and was assigned on average 102 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 23 from 40 possible points and ranked on 244 – 268. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 458
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 297

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 18% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 6.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 138.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 118 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 37 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 31.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 114.3% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1059 days in the period and was assigned on average 75 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 91 – 106. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 21 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 358
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 229

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 18.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 6.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 89 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 94 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 44 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 46.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 125.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 644 days and on average was assigned 105 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 51,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 147
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 76

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 16,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 7,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 6 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 5 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 140% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Kontrodiktórnosť hlavného pojednávania – 2 dni.
  • 2012 – 0; 2013 – Kontrodiktórnosť hlavného pojednávania – 2 dni.
  • 2012 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozhodnutie – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozhodnutie – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 201 ods. 1, ods. 2… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 20, § 145 ods. 1 Trestného… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 20, § 145 ods. 1 Trestného… Hearing was held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 201 ods. 1, ods. 2… Hearing was held on

  5. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin § 179/1, 3d Hearing was held on

  6. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 208 ods. 1 písm. a/… Hearing was held on

  7. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin § 179/1, 3d Hearing was held on

  8. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 201 ods. 1, ods. 2… Hearing was held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba - § 283 Hearing was held on

  10. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba - § 149, 285 Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.