JUDr. Terézia Mecelová

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Trnava, we register 115 hearings and 32 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Piešťany, we register 2,041 hearings and 1,488 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 7 years.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 5
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 4

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 889 days in the period and was assigned on average 29 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 49 – 61. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 98.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 162
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 159

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 449.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 379 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 316 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 83.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 338.5% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 3
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 3

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 479 days in the period and was assigned on average 40 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 18.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 507 – 524. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 3.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 99% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 96
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 95

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 702 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 898 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 606 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 67.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 86.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 136 days and on average was assigned 599 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 1701 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 727 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 345 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 46,8% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 19,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – vymenovanie do funkcie sudcu od 13.05.2013
  • 2013 – vymenovanie do funkcie sudcu od 13.05.2013
  • 2013 – 5. – 7.6.2013 – Inštitút Omšenie – porada sudcov – 3 dni
  • 2013 – 5. – 7.6.2013 – Inštitút Omšenie – porada sudcov – 3 dni

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Zmenky
    Odmietajúce odvolanie
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Zmenky
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydraženie práva… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 1.929,52 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, ochranu osobnosti a náhradu… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 4.988,57 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 10.000 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 12.480,40 € s… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 58.223,75 € s… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 11.141,10 € s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zamietnutní návrhu žalovaného… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 26.544,85 € s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.