Mgr. Vanda Mikulášová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Námestovo, we register 4,242 hearings and 2,886 judgements.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.NA.

The judge worked 1493 days in the period and was assigned on average 77 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 10.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 626 – 627. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 27.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 229
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 62

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.4%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 313.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 195 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 127 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 65.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 129.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1065 days in the period and was assigned on average 60 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 8 from 40 possible points and ranked on 724 – 727. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 8 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 19.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 155
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 30

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 8.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 411 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 453 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 158 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 34.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 69.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 638 days and on average was assigned 111 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 17,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 91
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 16

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 9,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 288 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 160 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 72 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 42,6% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 98,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 15,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 614 – 620. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 0,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 14,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 2
  • 2012 – 2

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Pestúnska starostlivosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie sumy 50 000 Eur… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Námestovo
    Judge – Mgr. Vanda Mikulášová
    Defendant – E. M.
  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Námestovo
    Judge – Mgr. Vanda Mikulášová
    Defendant – I. T.
  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 400,- Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Určenie práva zodpovedajúceho… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, O zaplatenie 92,- Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, - o zaplatenie 2 646,24 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Určenie vlastníckeho práva a… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Určenie, že nehnuteľnosti… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba na zaplatenie Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Určenie vecného bremena + PO Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 211,07 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Úprava práv a povinností k… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie relatívnej… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy v… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, O zaplatenie 631,14 € s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.